Falcons vs Bears — Week 6, 2026

The Falcons took over trailing 31-23 with 3:34 left, 1st & 10 at their own 28, 3 timeouts in hand, against the Bears.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Falcons 23, Bears 31. Bears won 31-23 — the drive turnover.

Falcons ball, down 8 — touchdown plus the two-pointer ties it. At their own 28, 3:34 on the clock.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 8.4% for Falcons. Our model starts at 9.2%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (3:34) (Shotgun) 7-Bi.Robinson left tackle to ATL 32 for 4 yards (94-A.Booker).
  2. (3:12) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 9-M.Penix pass incomplete deep right to 4-J.Dotson.
  3. (3:01) (Shotgun) 9-M.Penix sacked at ATL 14 for -8 yards (6-K.Gordon). FUMBLES (6-K.Gordon) [6-K.Gordon], RECOVERED by CHI-12-D.Bush at ATL 28. 12-D.Bush to ATL 28 for no gain (65-M.Bergeron).

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Curl route (+0.75 pts), and the weakest was Spike it (-1.01 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Curl route+0.75 pts
Deep post+0.65 pts
Pull RPO+0.50 pts
Quick slant+0.47 pts
QB keep+0.38 pts
Play action+0.28 pts
Quick out+0.17 pts
Deep comebacker+0.13 pts
Quick hook+0.13 pts
Deep corner+0.12 pts
Screen pass-0.04 pts
Quick RPO-0.28 pts
QB sneak-0.33 pts
Outside run-0.66 pts
Inside run-0.87 pts
Off-tackle run-0.95 pts
Spike it-1.01 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.