Ravens vs Patriots — Week 16, 2025

The Ravens took over trailing 28-24 with 2:03 left, 1st & 10 at their own 32, 3 timeouts in hand, against the Patriots.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Ravens 24, Patriots 28. Patriots won 28-24 — the drive turnover.

Ravens ball, down 4 — they need a touchdown to lead. At their own 32, 2:03 on the clock.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 31.1% for Ravens. Our model starts at 25.0%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (2:03) (Shotgun) 5-T.Huntley pass short right to 26-R.Ali to BAL 27 for -5 yards (7-C.Davis). NE-7-C.Davis was injured during the play.
  2. (1:57) (Shotgun) 5-T.Huntley pass short middle to 4-Z.Flowers to BAL 32 for 5 yards (44-K.Chaisson). FUMBLES (44-K.Chaisson), RECOVERED by NE-25-M.Jones at BAL 36.

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Curl route (+1.95 pts), and the weakest was Spike it (-2.27 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Curl route+1.95 pts
Pull RPO+1.48 pts
Quick slant+1.40 pts
QB keep+1.24 pts
Deep post+1.16 pts
Play action+0.95 pts
Quick out+0.68 pts
Quick hook+0.57 pts
Deep comebacker+0.34 pts
Deep corner+0.29 pts
Screen pass+0.22 pts
Quick RPO-0.39 pts
QB sneak-0.58 pts
Outside run-0.75 pts
Inside run-1.40 pts
Off-tackle run-1.62 pts
Spike it-2.27 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.