Jets vs Raiders — Week 10, 2023
The Jets took over trailing 16-12 with 0:53 left, 1st & 10 at their own 20, 1 timeout in hand, against the Raiders.
What really happened
Final: Jets 12, Raiders 16. Raiders won 16-12 — the drive time expired.
Jets ball, down 4 — they need a touchdown to lead. At their own 20, 0:53 on the clock.
nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 17.6% for Jets. Our model starts at 15.0%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.
The real drive, snap by snap
- (:53) (Shotgun) 2-Z.Wilson pass incomplete short middle.
- (:49) (Shotgun) 2-Z.Wilson pass short right to 83-T.Conklin to NYJ 29 for 9 yards (37-T.Hall, 69-A.Butler).
- (:26) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 2-Z.Wilson pass deep middle to 83-T.Conklin to LV 44 for 27 yards (1-M.Epps) [98-M.Crosby].
- (:13) (Shotgun) 2-Z.Wilson pass incomplete deep left to 82-X.Gipson.
- (:05) (Shotgun) 2-Z.Wilson pass incomplete deep left.
The opening call, by win probability
At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Curl route (+1.72 pts), and the weakest was Spike it (-1.57 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.
| Opening call | Expected WP change |
|---|---|
| Curl route | +1.72 pts |
| Deep post | +1.70 pts |
| Pull RPO | +1.25 pts |
| Quick slant | +1.10 pts |
| QB keep | +0.95 pts |
| Play action | +0.85 pts |
| Deep comebacker | +0.64 pts |
| Deep corner | +0.64 pts |
| Quick out | +0.55 pts |
| Quick hook | +0.47 pts |
| Screen pass | +0.17 pts |
| Quick RPO | -0.29 pts |
| QB sneak | -0.46 pts |
| Outside run | -0.97 pts |
| Inside run | -1.36 pts |
| Off-tackle run | -1.48 pts |
| Spike it | -1.57 pts |
This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.