Rams vs Lions — Week 6, 2016

The Rams took over trailing 31-28 with 1:29 left, 1st & 10 at their own 25, 0 timeouts in hand, against the Lions.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Rams 28, Lions 31. Lions won 31-28 — the drive turnover.

Rams ball, down 3 — a field goal ties it. At their own 25, 1:29 on the clock, no timeouts left.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 25.4% for Rams. Our model starts at 25.1%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (1:29) (Shotgun) 17-C.Keenum pass short right to 83-B.Quick to LA 29 for 4 yards (31-R.Bush).
  2. (1:09) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 17-C.Keenum pass deep middle intended for 88-L.Kendricks INTERCEPTED by 31-R.Bush at DET 45. 31-R.Bush to DET 45 for no gain.

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Curl route (+2.16 pts), and the weakest was Spike it (-2.27 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Curl route+2.16 pts
Pull RPO+1.66 pts
Quick slant+1.55 pts
Deep post+1.42 pts
QB keep+1.39 pts
Play action+1.12 pts
Quick out+0.80 pts
Quick hook+0.68 pts
Deep comebacker+0.52 pts
Deep corner+0.46 pts
Screen pass+0.32 pts
Quick RPO-0.32 pts
QB sneak-0.55 pts
Outside run-0.66 pts
Receiver pass-0.81 pts
Flea flicker-0.82 pts
Inside run-1.34 pts
End-around-1.52 pts
Off-tackle run-1.56 pts
Spike it-2.27 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.