Raiders vs Ravens — Week 4, 2016

The Raiders took over trailing 27-21 with 3:31 left, 1st & 10 at their own 34, 2 timeouts in hand, against the Ravens.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Raiders 28, Ravens 27. Raiders won 28-27 — the drive scored.

Raiders ball, down 6 — they need a touchdown to lead. At their own 34, 3:31 on the clock.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 18.1% for Raiders. Our model starts at 17.1%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (3:31) (Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass short middle to 15-M.Crabtree to LV 49 for 15 yards (57-C.Mosley).
  2. (2:59) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass short right to 15-M.Crabtree ran ob at BAL 40 for 11 yards.
  3. (2:53) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass incomplete short middle to 30-J.Richard.
  4. (2:49) (Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass short middle to 88-C.Walford to BAL 23 for 17 yards (54-Z.Orr).
  5. (2:25) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass incomplete deep middle to 88-C.Walford (32-E.Weddle). Clive Walford (LV) injured on play.
  6. (2:12) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass deep right to 15-M.Crabtree for 23 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Curl route (+1.21 pts), and the weakest was Spike it (-1.70 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Curl route+1.21 pts
Pull RPO+0.87 pts
Quick slant+0.83 pts
Deep post+0.74 pts
QB keep+0.72 pts
Play action+0.51 pts
Quick out+0.35 pts
Quick hook+0.27 pts
Deep comebacker+0.11 pts
Deep corner+0.08 pts
Screen pass+0.02 pts
Quick RPO-0.39 pts
QB sneak-0.48 pts
Outside run-0.72 pts
Flea flicker-0.78 pts
Receiver pass-0.78 pts
Inside run-1.14 pts
End-around-1.29 pts
Off-tackle run-1.29 pts
Spike it-1.70 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.