Seahawks vs Rams — Week 2, 2016

The Seahawks took over trailing 9-3 with 1:53 left, 1st & 10 at their own 12, 1 timeout in hand, against the Rams.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Seahawks 3, Rams 9. Rams won 9-3 — the drive turnover.

Seahawks ball, down 6 — they need a touchdown to lead. At their own 12, 1:53 on the clock.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 14.2% for Seahawks. Our model starts at 9.0%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (1:53) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass deep left to 16-T.Lockett to LA 35 for 53 yards (32-T.Hill). LA-32-T.Hill was injured during the play. His return is Questionable.
  2. (1:33) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass incomplete short middle to 32-C.Michael [99-A.Donald].
  3. (1:27) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass short right to 89-D.Baldwin to LA 35 for 5 yards (26-M.Barron).
  4. (:57) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass short right to 32-C.Michael to LA 27 for 8 yards (52-A.Ogletree). FUMBLES (52-A.Ogletree), RECOVERED by LA-52-A.Ogletree at LA 29. 52-A.Ogletree to LA 29 for no gain (73-J.Webb).

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Deep post (+0.23 pts), and the weakest was End-around (-1.61 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Deep post+0.23 pts
Curl route-0.08 pts
Pull RPO-0.23 pts
Deep comebacker-0.39 pts
Deep corner-0.42 pts
Quick slant-0.46 pts
Play action-0.48 pts
QB sneak-0.58 pts
QB keep-0.65 pts
Flea flicker-0.71 pts
Quick out-0.74 pts
Quick hook-0.75 pts
Quick RPO-0.79 pts
Screen pass-0.86 pts
Receiver pass-0.93 pts
Spike it-1.01 pts
Inside run-1.33 pts
Outside run-1.39 pts
Off-tackle run-1.42 pts
End-around-1.61 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.