Bears vs Vikings — Week 15, 2007

The Bears took over trailing 20-13 with 2:45 left, 1st & 10 at their own 10, 1 timeout in hand, against the Vikings.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Bears 13, Vikings 20. Vikings won 20-13 — the drive turnover.

Bears ball, down 7 — it takes a touchdown. Backed up at their own 10, 2:45 on the clock.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 8.9% for Bears. Our model starts at 8.0%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (2:45) (Shotgun) 18-K.Orton pass short middle to 82-G.Olsen to CHI 15 for 5 yards (56-E.Henderson).
  2. (2:19) (Shotgun) 18-K.Orton pass short left to 87-M.Muhammad pushed ob at CHI 34 for 19 yards (42-D.Sharper).
  3. (2:13) (Shotgun) 18-K.Orton pass short left to 23-D.Hester to CHI 45 for 11 yards (23-C.Griffin).
  4. (2:00) (Shotgun) 18-K.Orton pass incomplete short middle to 29-A.Peterson [93-K.Williams].
  5. (1:56) (Shotgun) 18-K.Orton pass deep middle intended for 80-B.Berrian INTERCEPTED by 42-D.Sharper at MIN -2. 42-D.Sharper to MIN 39 for 41 yards (87-M.Muhammad).

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Deep post (-0.07 pts), and the weakest was End-around (-1.48 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Deep post-0.07 pts
Curl route-0.32 pts
Pull RPO-0.41 pts
QB sneak-0.51 pts
Deep comebacker-0.54 pts
Deep corner-0.57 pts
Quick slant-0.62 pts
Play action-0.63 pts
Quick out-0.65 pts
Quick hook-0.67 pts
QB keep-0.68 pts
Quick RPO-0.70 pts
Screen pass-0.76 pts
Flea flicker-0.82 pts
Spike it-0.90 pts
Receiver pass-1.00 pts
Inside run-1.17 pts
Outside run-1.22 pts
Off-tackle run-1.24 pts
End-around-1.48 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.