Rams vs Broncos — Week 3, 2026

The Rams took over trailing 23-19 with 4:43 left, 1st & 10 at their own 23, 3 timeouts in hand, against the Broncos.

Call the plays yourself

What really happened

Final: Rams 26, Broncos 30. Broncos won 30-26 — the drive scored.

Rams ball, down 4 — they need a touchdown to lead. At their own 23, 4:43 on the clock.

nflverse's historical win-probability estimate for this exact situation was 26.1% for Rams. Our model starts at 27.2%. The two numbers are estimates, not verdicts — the gap between them is a reminder that endgame win probability is hard to pin down.

The real drive, snap by snap

  1. (4:43) (Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford sacked at LA 22 for -1 yards (96-E.Uwazurike).
  2. (4:16) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass deep right to 4-K.Mumpfield to LA 43 for 21 yards (22-B.Jones).
  3. (4:08) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass short right to 4-K.Mumpfield to DEN 48 for 9 yards (21-R.Moss).
  4. (3:46) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass deep right to 4-K.Mumpfield for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

The opening call, by win probability

At the first snap, the strongest opening call in our model was Curl route (+0.99 pts), and the weakest was Spike it (-2.34 pts). A positive number means the call improved the offense's expected win probability; a negative number means it cost them.

Opening callExpected WP change
Curl route+0.99 pts
Quick slant+0.84 pts
Pull RPO+0.76 pts
QB keep+0.73 pts
Play action+0.28 pts
Quick out+0.27 pts
Quick hook+0.17 pts
Screen pass-0.10 pts
Deep post-0.30 pts
Deep comebacker-0.53 pts
Quick RPO-0.57 pts
Outside run-0.59 pts
QB sneak-0.62 pts
Deep corner-0.64 pts
Inside run-1.17 pts
Off-tackle run-1.43 pts
Spike it-2.34 pts

This is our own model estimate, not the real coach's grade and not a claim about what the “correct” call was. Football decisions depend on the opponent, personnel and game plan — the model only measures how a call changes win probability in this situation.